Amidon Briefing · Independent Testing
Tested at Aberdeen: ABC vs. the Army Corps Standard
Intro: Claims are easy. Independent testing at a federal proving ground is not. Amidon Ballistic Concrete (ABC) went through a side-by-side comparative evaluation against SACON (Shock-Absorbing Concrete), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ own material for ballistic training construction — conducted by the U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center on behalf of the U.S. Marine Corps. Here’s what that program found.
Why SACON Was the Benchmark
SACON has been a standard reference point for ballistic-safe training construction for years. Being measured against it in a formal government test program isn’t a marketing comparison Amidon invented; it’s a comparison against the standard the industry itself uses.
Independent, Not Self-Reported
The Aberdeen results sit alongside independent testing from three separate outside labs: NTS-Chesapeake Testing for ballistic resistance, GHD for lead leaching, and BlueLine Consulting for compressive strength and ballistic penetration. ABC also carries a UL 752 Level 10+ rating, the highest bullet-resistance classification under that standard.
Why This Matters for Buyers
For an agency or training command evaluating a live-fire facility, the material behind the walls isn’t a detail — it’s the whole safety case. A federal proving ground test result, cross-checked by independent labs, is the kind of evidence that holds up under procurement-level scrutiny, not just a sales conversation.
What the Aberdeen Program Found
Selected results from the comparative test program, provided to Amidon for reference:
- 4/4
ABC wall panels passed certification testing against all four standard-duty threats evaluated — 9mm, 5.56mm, 7.62mm, and .50-caliber — against the same depth-of-penetration criteria used to certify the government-standard material.
- 1,923 psi
Average compressive strength of cores pulled from ABC wall panels, roughly 38% higher than the paired SACON cores tested in the same program (1,390 psi average).
- +
ABC’s repair patches outlasted the comparison patches in sustained-fire durability testing, holding up through more rounds before reaching the maintenance action point.
- Passed
ABC met the test criterion for blast and fragmentation resistance against a direct M67 fragmentation grenade at a 5-foot standoff.
See the full Aberdeen Tested testing record
This article covers select results from the Aberdeen comparison. For the full testing record and how it fits alongside Amidon's other independent lab results, see the Aberdeen Tested page.
View Aberdeen Tested →Recent Posts